Attribute binding
Attribute binding in Aurelia is a powerful feature that allows you to bind to any native HTML attribute in your templates. This enables dynamic updates to element attributes such as classes, styles, and other standard HTML attributes.
Basic Binding Syntax
The basic syntax for binding to attributes in Aurelia is straightforward:
attribute-name.bind="value"
is a bindingattribute-name
is the target of the bindingbind
is the command of the bindingvalue
is the expression of the binding
You can bind to almost any attribute listed in the comprehensive HTML attributes list, which can be found here.
In a binding with empty expression, i.e attribute-name.bind
or attribute-name.bind=""
, the expression
is automatically inferred based on the target
: it'll have the value of the camel-case version of the target
, so attribute-name.bind=""
would mean attribute-name.bind="attributeName"
. This behavior is also present in other commands:
.one-time
.to-view
.from-view
.two-way
.attr
Binding Techniques and Syntax
Aurelia provides multiple methods for attribute binding, each with its syntax and use cases.
Interpolation Binding
Interpolation allows for embedding dynamic values within strings. Here's an example using interpolation to bind the id
attribute:
Keyword Binding
Aurelia supports several binding keywords, each defining the data flow between the view model and the view:
one-time
: Updates the view from the view model once and does not reflect subsequent changes.to-view
/one-way
: Continuously updates the view from the view model.from-view
: Updates the view model based on changes in the view.two-way
: Creates a two-way data flow, keeping the view and view model in sync.bind
: Automatically determines the appropriate binding mode, defaulting totwo-way
for form elements andto-view
for most other elements.
Examples of Keyword Binding
Binding to Images
Binding image attributes, such as src
and alt
, is as simple as:
Disabling Elements
Bind to the disabled
attribute to disable buttons and inputs dynamically:
InnerHtml and TextContent
Choose between innerhtml
for rendering HTML content and textcontent
for text-only content:
Advanced Binding Techniques
How Attribute Binding Works
Aurelia uses a mapping function to convert properties to HTML attributes. The attribute mapper handles the conversion, typically changing kebab-case to camelCase. However, not all properties map directly to attributes.
Using the .attr
Tag
.attr
TagIf automatic mapping fails, use .attr
to ensure proper attribute binding:
Attribute Binding Behavior
Apply the attribute binding behavior with .bind
and & attr
to specify the binding type:
Note on the syntaxes
Expression syntax
One way to understand the varieties of the binding syntaxes, or why we have both binding command and interpolation, is to look at the JS counter part, via the following example:
All the above examples of building
fullName
fromfirstName
andlastName
arrive at the same result, but there are at least three ways! This is to illustrate that sometimes, depending on the preference, one can choose one over another, and the framework should have the flexibility to reflect JavaScript the language.Attribute targeting syntax
Another confusion point is the availability of both
.bind
and.attr
syntaxes. One may ask why we need both.Consider the following example of setting the
id
attribute on an<input>
element:Either setting the id via
id
property, or callingsetAttribute('id', ...)
on the<input>
gives the same outcome, but we have two ways! This is partly because of preference one may have, and the fact that Aurelia works with properties, and not all properties reflect to their attribute counterparts. For example, when doing:the
my-custom-attr.bind="someValue"
will be translated into a binding that update the propertymyCustomAttr
on the<input>
, based on the value ofsomeValue
. But the html doesn't reflect thismyCustomAttr
property whenever it changes. If we want to have the<input>
html to reflect that, we need to call theinput.setAttribute('my-custom-attr')
. Consider.attr
is a simpler way of doing this.
Remember, interpolation and keyword binding achieve similar results, and there should be no noticeable difference in performance or features. Choose the syntax based on your preference and the specific requirements of your project.
Last updated